Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
        View All Law Topics        Free Case Review        Legal Resource Directory        FreeAdvice Answers       
Home > Law Advice > Defective Products > Birth Injury Lawsuits & Lawyers > Medtronic Lawsuit
Defective Products
  All States        
Canadian Law Firms Sue Medtronic for $550 Million

Two Canadian law firms have filed a class action law suit against Minneapolis, MN based technology giant Medtronic after it recalled its Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead last week. The Canadian law suit seeks a whopping $550 Million for the manufacture and sale of a defective product.

Latest law suit in a probable series of many

The Canadian lawsuit, filed by REKO Barristers and Rochon Genova LLP, is the latest lawsuit to be filed against the Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic of Canada, Ltd.. The company recalled its defibrillator lead after discovering that the lead may fracture, causing patients' hearts not to receive an electrical shock when needed or to receive too many shocks when not needed. The company has said that the defective product, which it has stopped selling, may have caused five reported deaths.

Additional lawsuits have been filed against Medtronic in Minnesota and Puerto Rico and industry experts say that this may only be the beginning as Medtronic may have known about the defect long before it came forward and recalled the product. If that is the case, lawyers now have the task of finding out how much the company knew – and when they knew it.

Lack of required testing

Defibrillator devices are normally scrutinized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before being approved for sale on the market. However, only limited testing was required on Medtronic's Sprint Fidelis lead as it replaced an older version, the Sprint Quattro. According to the FDA, the differences in the leads were not significant enough to warrant additional testing. The FDA is now under fire for not doing enough to protect the public against defective products – especially in this case as the consequences could be deadly. However, in February 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in Riegel v. Medtronics that patients injured by certain medical devices approved by the FDA cannot sue the product's manufacturer. As of August 2008, the Supreme Court's ruling is being challenged in both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. If you think you may have been injured from Medtronic's Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead, contact an attorney in your area to discuss your situation. Click here, to contact a Medtronic recall attorney whose practice focuses in this area of the law or to lean more about the Medtronic Recall.

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Personal Injury Attorney.



Related Information
» Defective Products
» Manufacturing defects
» Product Defect Attorneys
» Defective Product Claims
» Product Defect Liability and Damages
» Tire Defects
» ATV
» Defibrillator Recall
» FDA and Medical Device Recalls
» Calaxo ACL Screws
» Harley Davidson Wobble
» Honda
» Kugel Hernia Mesh Patch
» Medtronic Defibrillator Recall
» Nuva Ring Contraceptive Device
» Stryker Hip Replacements
» Tenderflow Pediatric Arterial Cannulae
» Shoulder Pain Pumps
» VA Hospital Prostate Biopsy
» Toyota/Lexus Stuck Accelerator
» Yamaha Rhino Rollover

Topics Related To Defective Products
» Personal Injury
» Asbestos
» Back Injuries
» Birth Injury
» Brain Injury
» Defective Products
» Drug-Toxic Chemicals
» More Drug-Toxic Chemicals
» Libel And Slander
» Pain & Suffering/Lost Wages
» Property Damage
» Other Injuries
» Spinal Cord Injury
» Structured Settlements
» Toxic Mold
» Whiplash/Neck Injuries
Get A Free Case Evaluation
From An Experienced Personal Injury Attorney.
It’s Fast and Free!



» Ask a question in our legal forum

» Search our legal resource directory

» Find an attorney in your area

» Let us find a lawyer for you




HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime. State Law Center  |  Legal Resource Directory  |  Legal Articles  |  Insurance Advice and Quotes  |  FreeAdvice Answers  |  Community Forums
Media  |  Privacy Policy  |  About Us  |  Contact Us

FreeAdvice® has been providing millions of consumers with outstanding legal and insurance information and general advice, free, since 1995. While not a substitute for personal advice from a licensed professional, FreeAdvice is available AS IS, subject to our disclaimer and conditions of use.
FreeAdvice®, AttorneyPages®, ExpertPages® are registered trademarks and units of Advice Company.
All Rights Reserved © 1995-2009